IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/mrr-12-2018-0494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of fair supervision on employees’ emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Ivy Kyei-Poku

Abstract

Purpose - Despite the importance of interactional fairness, it has been assessed less frequently in literature than has procedural and distributive justice. The effects of interactional fairness are at times stronger than the effects for procedural and distributive fairness, given that supervisors are prominent in any workplace environment and the chief source for interpreting information related to matters such as suitable business practices and goals needed by organizations. This study aims to examine the mediating mechanisms through which interactional justice influences emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. Specifically, the hypothesis proposes that perceived organizational support and a sense of belongingness simultaneously mediates the relationship between interactional justice and emotional exhaustion, which in turn affects withdrawal cognitions. Design/methodology/approach - The author draws on the literature and studies on the link between organizational justice, stress and turnover to develop the hypotheses, collecting data from 141 employees of different organizations and occupations. Findings - Results of partial least squares structural equation modeling and Preacher and Hayes’ (2004) bootstrapping approach reveal that interactional justice is significantly positively associated with perceptions of organizational support and belongingness, which in turn is negatively associated with emotional exhaustion. Research limitations/implications - Interactionally fair treatment engenders perceptions of organizational support and heightens a sense of belongingness, subsequently reducing the burden of physical and emotional fatigue on individuals and thereby freeing employees from engaging in turnover cognitions. Practical implications - The study underscores the importance of fair supervisors. Results suggest that fair supervisors help employees estimate the extent to which their organization is supportive. In addition, fair supervisors reassure subordinates that they are valued, which in turn lessens the experience of emotional exhaustion, giving organizations a competitive advantage due to the more favorable behavioral intentions held by employees. Originality/value - Interactional justice has been assessed less frequently in literature than has procedural and distributive justice. Research has overlooked the underlying process of how interactional justice reactions might motivate emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions responses. Thus, this study identifies an expanded group of mediators that link interactional justice to emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivy Kyei-Poku, 2019. "The influence of fair supervision on employees’ emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(9), pages 1116-1132, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-12-2018-0494
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0494/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0494/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-12-2018-0494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.