IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/maj-01-2013-0801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect ofguanxiand ethical orientations on Chinese auditors' ethical reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Mingzhi Liu

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Chinese auditors' personal values (guanxiand ethical orientations) on their ethical reasoning (ethical judgments and behavioral intentions). In addition, this study aims to explore the joint effect ofguanxiand ethical orientation on auditors' ethical reasoning. Design/methodology/approach - – This study is based on a field survey of 191 auditors working in Certified Public Accounting (CPA) firms that operate in the People's Republic of China (China). Findings - – The main findings indicate thatguanxiand relativism orientations negatively associate with, while idealism orientation positively associates with, auditors' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. However, when decomposing the overall ethical judgment into three judgment groups, the main effects ofguanxiand ethical orientations on auditors' ethical judgments become marginal and those effects fully hold only when using acceptability as criteria to judge questionable behavior in the vignettes. In addition, the results of the joint effect ofguanxiand ethical orientations indicate thatguanxiorientation weakens both the positive effect of idealism and the negative effect of relativism orientations on auditors' ethical reasoning. Originality/value - – This study contributes the literature by investigating the ethical reasoning of auditors in a country with a relatively weak legal system that relies onguanxi(literally, interpersonal relationships and connections) culture to operate business. Furthermore, this study extends the literature by documenting the moderating effect ofguanxiorientation on the relation between auditors' ethical orientation and their ethical reasoning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingzhi Liu, 2013. "Effect ofguanxiand ethical orientations on Chinese auditors' ethical reasoning," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(9), pages 815-837, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-01-2013-0801
    DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-01-2013-0801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-01-2013-0801/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-01-2013-0801/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MAJ-01-2013-0801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-01-2013-0801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.