IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jpifpp/jpif-06-2016-0038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Tajani
  • Pierluigi Morano

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a decision-support methodology for public and private subjects involved in the enhancement of public properties. In particular, with reference to cases in which the disused public property can be sold and the range of functions that define the highest and best use of the conversion was identified, the developed model allows for the assessment of the financial feasibility of the initiatives, in relation to the corresponding investment risks. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed model integrates the mathematical logic of goal programming for the evaluation of the financial conveniences of the parties (public and private) involved in the enhancement of a public property with statistical approaches (value at risk+exponentially weighted moving average) so as to determine the investment risk of the private investor. The application of the model to a real case study highlighted the potentialities of the proposed methodology. Findings - The model allows to determine: the optimal mix of intended uses to be realized in the public property under analysis; the fair value of the public property for the parties involved in the transaction; and the Pareto-optimal frontier of the expected profits, as a function of the risk appetite of the private investor. Practical implications - The defined model responds to the growing international interest in the enhancement of public buildings, satisfies the objectives of the substantial reduction of soil sealing and urban sustainability, stimulates the urban regeneration of deprived areas of the cities through the reactivation of large buildings that have been disused or underused for too long. Originality/value - The present research allows to provide effective evaluation tools capable of outlining the opportunities of redevelopment initiatives and examines the risk factors that often invalidate the initial forecasts of the private entrepreneur and/or stop the activation of investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano, 2017. "Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 75-100, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:jpif-06-2016-0038
    DOI: 10.1108/JPIF-06-2016-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-06-2016-0038/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPIF-06-2016-0038/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JPIF-06-2016-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moonsun Park & Nahyun Kwon & Joosung Lee & Sanghyo Lee & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Probabilistic Maintenance Cost Analysis for Aged Multi-Family Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Anthea Chiovitti, 2017. "The Assessment of Real Estate Initiatives to Be Included in the Socially-Responsible Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Morano, Pierluigi & Tajani, Francesco, 2018. "Saving soil and financial feasibility. A model to support public-private partnerships in the regeneration of abandoned areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 40-48.
    4. Elena Fregonara & Diego Giuseppe Ferrando & Sara Pattono, 2018. "Economic–Environmental Sustainability in Building Projects: Introducing Risk and Uncertainty in LCCE and LCCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Antonio Nesticò & Maria Rosaria Guarini & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Sica, 2019. "An Economic Analysis Algorithm for Urban Forestry Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Tajani, Francesco & Morano, Pierluigi & Di Liddo, Felicia, 2020. "The optimal combinations of the eligible functions in multiple property assets enhancement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:jpif-06-2016-0038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.