IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jopppp/jopp-02-2020-0013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Navarani Vejaratnam
  • Zeeda Fatimah Mohamad
  • Santha Chenayah

Abstract

Purpose - Government green procurement (GGP) is becoming a popular environmental policy instrument to spur the economy whilst protecting the environment. However, the implementation of GGP is impeded by various barriers. This paper aims to analyse the existing literature on barriers impeding GGP. Design/methodology/approach - This systematic literature review was guided by the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) review method. A total of 29 articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were selected for the review. Findings - Five themes, i.e. finance, legal, people, knowledge and organisation, emerged from this review, which further produced 16 sub-themes. Lack of knowledge and awareness were the major barriers for GGP, while financial constraint was not the major barrier for GGP, as previously perceived. Barriers related to organisation were the most complex. Certain barriers were found more in developed or developing countries. Research limitations/implications - Only article journals with empirical data were selected. Review articles, book series, books, chapters in books and conference proceedings were excluded. Practical implications - Public managers should place highest priority to enhance knowledge and awareness of procurers on GGP. Other important initiatives to be undertaken include emulating best practices, implementing change management and incentivising suppliers to tackle the prevalent barriers of GGP. Finally, with increasing evidences on barriers related to GGP, public managers should consider mapping and analysing specific barriers hindering GGP in their organisation/country. Social implications - A less challenging and efficient implementation of GGP contributes to a cleaner environment. Originality/value - This article will be the first to systematically review the barriers of GGP.

Suggested Citation

  • Navarani Vejaratnam & Zeeda Fatimah Mohamad & Santha Chenayah, 2020. "A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(4), pages 451-471, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-02-2020-0013
    DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raymond Stokke & Xinlu Qiu & Magnus Sparrevik & Shannon Truloff & Iselin Borge & Luitzen Boer, 2023. "Procurement for zero-emission construction sites: a comparative study of four European cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 72-86, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-02-2020-0013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.