IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jmlcpp/jmlc-11-2020-0129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The financial action taskforce and money laundering: critical analysis of the Panama papers and the role of the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Aisha Hassan Al-Emadi

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to study the effectiveness of the implementation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations in the UK in an attempt to combat the laundering of proceeds of corruption. Design/methodology/approach - A desk review of secondary resources was conducted to analyze available literature to examine the research topic. Findings - The leakage of 11.5 million documents, known as the Panama papers, has revealed that the UK functioned as a safe haven for illicit and corrupt money. In an attempt to address this, the country called for a public registry of beneficial owners to disclose the identities of the owners of the incorporated corporations and to extend them to individuals abroad holding UK property. The FATF report recognizes the UK’s far-reaching regulation. Despite the measures taken, UK still faces serious risks with regard to the laundering of criminal proceeds, which demonstrates that technical compliance with FATF rules is not enough to effectively curb money laundering. Originality/value - This study suggests that FATF rules’ effectiveness in identifying instances of laundering the proceeds of corruption is limited because of the deeply rooted system vulnerabilities and the rapid changes in money laundering trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisha Hassan Al-Emadi, 2021. "The financial action taskforce and money laundering: critical analysis of the Panama papers and the role of the United Kingdom," Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 752-761, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-11-2020-0129
    DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0129/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0129/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-11-2020-0129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.