IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jiabrp/jiabr-02-2020-0044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do takaful operators choose which model to adopt? A case study from the Kingdom of Bahrain

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Mansoor Alkhan
  • M. Kabir Hassan

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to provide an analysis on howtakafuloperators choose, whichtakafulmodel to adopt when managing their insurance operations. Design/methodology/approach - The research uses a qualitative methodology and uses the Kingdom of Bahrain as a case study. A single/holistic case study design is used to holistically analyse how atakafuloperator chooses whichtakafulmodel to adopt when managing its insurance operations. Findings - The results reveal that generally,takafuloperators adopt either the hybrid wakala-mudharaba or wakala model oftakaful, depending on whether atakafuloperator is managing/investing the participants’ general or family fund, respectively. Research limitations/implications - As the empirical data and results pertain to one jurisdiction, it may be difficult to generalize the empirical findings upon other jurisdictions. Originality/value - This research may have contributed to knowledge by adding to literature empirical data and results in relation totakafulin the Kingdom of Bahrain that may have not previously existed in literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Mansoor Alkhan & M. Kabir Hassan, 2020. "How do takaful operators choose which model to adopt? A case study from the Kingdom of Bahrain," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(9), pages 1677-1688, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-02-2020-0044
    DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-02-2020-0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-02-2020-0044/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-02-2020-0044/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JIABR-02-2020-0044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-02-2020-0044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.