IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jecpps/v6y2012i3p194-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inuit culture and opportunity recognition for commercial caribou harvests in the bio economy

Author

Listed:
  • Aldene H. Meis Mason
  • Robert B. Anderson
  • Leo‐Paul Dana

Abstract

Purpose - This case study aims to explore the affect of Canadian Inuit culture on recognizing opportunities from caribou when participating in the bio economy and decision making and benefit sharing considerations for Inuit partnerships arsing from the northern bioeconomy. Design/methodology/approach - This Inuit case study in northern Canada combined Elder interviews, a focus group and product elicitation techniques. First, the Inuit identified traditional uses of caribou for health care. Second, they explored its potential uses for biomedicines, nutraceuticals and functional foods. Third, they discussed partnerships for development and benefits that should result. Findings - Inuit had the right to develop and sell caribou products. Decisions about products and processes should be up to the community. Ensuring food security was critical. They preferred partnering with Inuit and northern businesses and government. University and business partnerships needed to provide ongoing monetary and non‐monetary benefits such as employment, new skills and knowledge, and networks. Research limitations/implications - Conclusions based on one case study need to be confirmed by surveying other Inuit communities. Future research should also include Inuit youth. Practical implications - This research provides an increased understanding of the commons, the use of traditional resources, food security and the interaction of Indigenous culture on opportunity recognition for policy makers, businesses, indigenous communities, and university researchers. Originality/value - This research paper integrates commons, indigenous entrepreneurship, opportunity recognition and bioeconomy. Furthermore, it provides the Inuit with a voice which they feel has been lacking in the business literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldene H. Meis Mason & Robert B. Anderson & Leo‐Paul Dana, 2012. "Inuit culture and opportunity recognition for commercial caribou harvests in the bio economy," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 194-212, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jecpps:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:194-212
    DOI: 10.1108/17506201211258388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17506201211258388/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17506201211258388/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17506201211258388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ericka Molina-Ramírez & Virginia Barba-Sánchez, 2021. "Embeddedness as a Differentiating Element of Indigenous Entrepreneurship: Insights from Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Jamie Snook & Ashlee Cunsolo & David Borish & Chris Furgal & James D. Ford & Inez Shiwak & Charlie T. R. Flowers & Sherilee L. Harper, 2020. "“We’re Made Criminals Just to Eat off the Land”: Colonial Wildlife Management and Repercussions on Inuit Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jecpps:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:194-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.