IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jeaspp/jeas-03-2020-0024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New approach for target setting mechanism of course outcomes in higher education accreditation

Author

Listed:
  • Dayananda P
  • Mrityunjaya V. Latte
  • Mahesh S. Raisinghani
  • Sowmyarani CN

Abstract

Purpose - Standard quality is very highly important parameter in the education sector. Accreditation is a process where standard quality of education is given and the process of continuous improvement is defined. Emphasizing quality of student education is achieved through outcome-based education system (OBE). Program outcomes signify the comprehension, skills and attitude the students should have at the end of the program. At the end of each course, course outcomes signify the knowledge acquired by the students. Course outcomes assessment is one of the key aspects of the OBE model. In this research, the following four factors: subject quality, number of times subject handled by faculty members, faculty experience and student quality with different weightage, are used for analysis of the target setting for individual courses, used for higher education accreditation. This new approach for target setting will improve the teaching and learning process. Design/methodology/approach - Four factors: subject quality, number of times subject handled by faculty members, faculty experience and student quality with different weightage, are used for analysis of the target setting for individual courses, used for higher education accreditation. Practical implications - Using proposed approach, higher targets can be achieved in teaching and learning. Findings - New approach for target setting will improve the teaching and learning process. Research limitations/implications - Proposed approach for target setting will improve the teaching and learning process; it should be implemented across all engineering colleges or universities. Social implications - All engineering colleges will have impact on teaching and learning process. Originality/value - The following four factors: subject quality, number of times subject handled by faculty members, faculty experience and student quality with different weightage, are used for analysis of the target setting for individual courses, used for higher education accreditation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayananda P & Mrityunjaya V. Latte & Mahesh S. Raisinghani & Sowmyarani CN, 2020. "New approach for target setting mechanism of course outcomes in higher education accreditation," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 79-89, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-03-2020-0024
    DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-03-2020-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEAS-03-2020-0024/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEAS-03-2020-0024/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JEAS-03-2020-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onesmus Ayaya & Marius Pretorius, 2021. "The State of Business Rescue Practitioners Professional Accreditation," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jeaspp:jeas-03-2020-0024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.