IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jamrpp/jamr-11-2022-0225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of meaningful work unifying 20 years of theoretical and substantive contributions (2000–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Kim-Lim Tan
  • Adriel K.S. Sim
  • Steffi Sze-Nee Yap
  • Sanhakot Vithayaporn
  • Ani Wahyu Rachmawati

Abstract

Purpose - Meaningful work is gaining importance in the core domains of human resources research. However, there is confusion regarding what constitutes meaningful work and its determinants and outcomes. Earlier studies have conflated conceptual and empirical arguments. Hence, researchers lack clear insights into factors related to employees' experiences of meaningfulness. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned issue. Design/methodology/approach - The authorsconducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of 88 studies (2000–2020) meeting relevant criteria to identify dominant trends and significant gaps in the authors’ understanding of meaningful work. Findings - This review identified six aspects to conceptualize meaningful work. At the same time, the authors highlighted the dominant theory and the instrument used to explain and measure meaningful work. Based on the same, the authors identified different groups of individual and organizational-level determinants and outcomes of finding meaning in work. The analysis also indicates that the comprehension of meaningful work was restricted because most data were obtained from the USA, Europe and certain regions of Asia. During this assessment, the authors observed that several studies emphasized individual-level effects, self-reporting and cross-sectional studies, which restricted the ability to make causal inferences. Originality/value - This study extends earlier works where the authors stock-take existing research for the past 20 years and build on past trajectories to enrich the authors’ understanding of meaningful work. Unlike earlier works that focused on a specific domain, such as human resource development, this work differentiates by taking an integrated framework-based approach leveraging the antecedents, decisions and outcomes (ADO) and the theories, contexts and method (TCM) framework to consolidate and advance knowledge in the field thoroughly.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim-Lim Tan & Adriel K.S. Sim & Steffi Sze-Nee Yap & Sanhakot Vithayaporn & Ani Wahyu Rachmawati, 2023. "A systematic review of meaningful work unifying 20 years of theoretical and substantive contributions (2000–2020)," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 462-512, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jamrpp:jamr-11-2022-0225
    DOI: 10.1108/JAMR-11-2022-0225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAMR-11-2022-0225/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAMR-11-2022-0225/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAMR-11-2022-0225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darshna V. Banker & Shamita Garg & Mohita Maggon, 2023. "Virtual Leadership: Bibliometrics, Framework-Based Systematic Review, and Future Agenda," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(3), pages 300-332, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jamrpp:jamr-11-2022-0225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.