IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/imefmp/imefm-12-2020-0633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward the Black–Litterman with Shariah-compliant asset pricing model: a case study on the Indonesian stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Retno Subekti
  • Abdurakhman
  • Dedi Rosadi

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to demonstrate portfolio modeling, which leads to Sharia compliance in encountering crises because of COVID-19. The authors proposed modifying the Black–Litterman (BL) model adapted to the Sharia principle. The implementation of BL onShariah-compliant stock data with capital asset pricing model (CAPM) requires adjustment because of the interest rate in the calculation. Thus, the objective of this study is to develop and evaluate the modified BL forShariah-compliant stock portfolios in the financial crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach - The Sharia-compliant asset pricing model (SCAPM) with the inflation rate was regarded as the new starting point in the BL model. This proposed model was implemented in Indonesia using monthly returns from the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) list collected from February 2014 to June 2019. Furthermore, the portfolio performance of BL-SCAPM was compared with two reference portfolios, the mean-variance method and BL-CAPM. Findings - The result presents that the portfolio performance of BL-SCAPM outperformed the MV and BL-CAPM. The impact of the Sharpe ratio of BL-SCAPM was more significant than the reference portfolio. The equal benefit was procured from both portfolios in July and August 2019. After the COVID-19 outbreak was officially declared in January 2020, the performance of BL-SCAPM was still above the BL. Despite a decline in portfolio value before and during the outbreak, the reference portfolio losses were higher than those of BL-SCAPM. Hence, this study manifested that BL-SCAPM outperformed the reference portfolio. Practical implications - The results illustrate the empirical study which can be implemented for theShariah-compliant stock market in Indonesia. By evaluating portfolio value on the COVID crisis for long investment, replacing CAPM with SCAPM in the BL model can transform the asset proportion. It decreased the portfolio loss during the crisis. Future research can be developed more from the open problems in this implementation to deliver the portfolio model into theShariahframework with varied SCAPM in BL. Originality/value - The attention to BL studies on portfolio building with Sharia-compliant stocks is rarely focused on the Islamic perspective. Hence, the novelty of this research is the idea of modifying the BL model with aShariahstarting point. More generally, this research enrichesShariahfinancial literacy regarding the stock market and, specifically, its implementation in the Indonesian stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Retno Subekti & Abdurakhman & Dedi Rosadi, 2022. "Toward the Black–Litterman with Shariah-compliant asset pricing model: a case study on the Indonesian stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(6), pages 1150-1164, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:imefmp:imefm-12-2020-0633
    DOI: 10.1108/IMEFM-12-2020-0633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2020-0633/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2020-0633/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2020-0633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:imefmp:imefm-12-2020-0633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.