IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijsepp/v34y2007i6p415-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do we ignore the best solution for improving unequal income distribution?

Author

Listed:
  • Ben‐David Nissim

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to propose a tax reform that would reduce income taxes and other indirect taxes while at the same time increasing inheritance and estate taxes. Such a reform is economically very efficient and would certainly equalize income distribution. Design/methodology/approach - A wide review of the death and inheritance taxes in the USA and Europe is presented. Findings - Government's revenue from inheritance and gifts is lower than 1 percent of GDP. This is due mainly to a combination of considerable tax‐free allowances for the closest relatives and high thresholds where the top rates apply. No empirical examination of the effect of inheritance tax on economic growth or economic efficiency could be found. Practical implications - Because inheritance taxes are economically efficient, they improve the immoral unequal income distribution drastically. Therefore, it should be concluded that inheritance tax must be implemented. Originality/value - This paper discusses the various economic aspects of the proposed tax reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben‐David Nissim, 2007. "Why do we ignore the best solution for improving unequal income distribution?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(6), pages 415-424, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:34:y:2007:i:6:p:415-424
    DOI: 10.1108/03068290710751821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068290710751821/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068290710751821/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/03068290710751821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:34:y:2007:i:6:p:415-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.