IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijoemp/ijoem-08-2020-0925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Annual report narrative disclosures, information asymmetry and future firm performance: evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Ly Thi Hai Tran
  • Thoa Thi Kim Tu
  • Tran Thi Hong Nguyen
  • Hoa Thi Lien Nguyen
  • Xuan Vinh Vo

Abstract

Purpose - This paper examines the role of the annual report’s linguistic tone in predicting future firm performance in an emerging market, Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach - Both manual coding approach and the naïve Bayesian algorithm are employed to determine the annual report tone, which is then used to investigate its impact on future firm performance. Findings - The study finds that tone can predict firm performance one year ahead. The predictability of tone is strengthened for firms that have a high degree of information asymmetry. Besides, the government’s regulatory reforms on corporate disclosures enhance the predictive ability of tone. Research limitations/implications - The study suggests the naïve Bayesian algorithm as a cost-efficient alternative for human coding in textual analysis. Also, information asymmetry and regulation changes should be modeled in future research on narrative disclosures. Practical implications - The study sends messages to both investors and policymakers in emerging markets. Investors should pay more attention to the tone of annual reports for improving the accuracy of future firm performance prediction. Policymakers should regularly revise and update regulations on qualitative disclosure to reduce information asymmetry. Originality/value - This study enhances understanding of the annual report’s role in a non-Western country that has been under-investigated. The research also provides original evidence of the link between annual report tone and future firm performance under different information asymmetry degrees. Furthermore, this study justifies the effectiveness of the governments’ regulatory reforms on corporate disclosure in developing countries. Finally, by applying both the human coding and machine learning approach, this research contributes to the literature on textual analysis methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ly Thi Hai Tran & Thoa Thi Kim Tu & Tran Thi Hong Nguyen & Hoa Thi Lien Nguyen & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2021. "Annual report narrative disclosures, information asymmetry and future firm performance: evidence from Vietnam," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 351-375, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijoemp:ijoem-08-2020-0925
    DOI: 10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0925/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0925/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Annual report tone; Future firm performance; Information asymmetry; Narrative disclosures; Regulatory reform; Vietnam; G14; G18; G30;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijoemp:ijoem-08-2020-0925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.