IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ajemsp/ajems-03-2022-0096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-worker incivility and employee engagement among Ghanaian bank workers: does emotional intelligence matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Kwesi Amponsah-Tawiah
  • Nana Kojo Ayimadu Baafi
  • Jusice Mensah

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to ascertain the mechanism through which an employee engages at the workplace when faced with an uncivil act. Design/methodology/approach - The study adopted a cross-sectional survey design to sample 482 participants drawn from commercial banks operating in Ghana. The population of the study (employees working in banks in Ghana) was selected owing to the recent reforms in the sector coupled with the emerging fear of loss of jobs as a result of the corona virus pandemic and the potential impact on employee work attitudes. Participants were however selected conveniently and employees who were available and willing to participate given questionnaires to complete. Findings - Co-worker incivility significantly and negatively predicted employee engagement, while emotional intelligence (EI) predicted employee engagement positively. Furthermore, EI served as a mediator between co-worker incivility and engagement. Research limitations/implications - Despite these encouraging findings, the mechanism underlying these effects could not be identified. Therefore, future studies can establish the underlying mechanisms of these effects by using qualitative studies or the mixed-method. Future studies can also explore other personal resources such as psychological capital or personality traits in mitigating the negative effects of workplace incivility. Practical implications - Given the fact that incivility has a significant negative influence on employees within the organisation, there is the need for government and policy makers to enact an inclusive policy that deals with employee mistreatments and most especially low key mistreatment. This could be done through the promulgation of a national policy on psychosocial risk management (PRIMA) as most of the uncivil acts in organisations present as psychosocial risk factors. Secondly, at the organisational level there is the need to consider EI of employees most especially when recruiting employees so as to avoid squared pegs being placed in round holes. Originality/value - This research found out that for an employee to engage or not when faced with an uncivil act, one’s EI has to play a role. The appraisal theory was used to provide a sufficient grounds in exploring the role of EI in the evaluations and determination of occurrences in organisations as intentional or unintentional, positive or negative and hence the resultant work outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwesi Amponsah-Tawiah & Nana Kojo Ayimadu Baafi & Jusice Mensah, 2023. "Co-worker incivility and employee engagement among Ghanaian bank workers: does emotional intelligence matter?," African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 490-503, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ajemsp:ajems-03-2022-0096
    DOI: 10.1108/AJEMS-03-2022-0096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2022-0096/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2022-0096/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2022-0096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ajemsp:ajems-03-2022-0096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.