IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v27y2007i3p413-430id573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The two ways of Ricardo’s principle of comparative advantages and the gold standard

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudio Gontijo

Abstract

This article critically resumes Ricardo’s principle of comparative advantages pointing out internal coherence problems that have been neglected by the specialized literature. First, long-lasting disequilibria observed in the balance of trade seem incompatible with the idea that these disequilibria are caused by technical advances that change relative prices. Second, comparative advantages do not seem to work in an economy with a universally accepted commodity-money. Finally, the contradiction between the gold standard mechanisms, ruled by Smith’s “Law of Reflux”, and the quantitative theory of money, which is a necessary condition for the “second way” of the theory of comparative advantages. JEL Classification: F10.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudio Gontijo, 2007. "The two ways of Ricardo’s principle of comparative advantages and the gold standard," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 27(3), pages 413-430.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:413-430:id:573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/573/571
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International trade theory; Ricardian international trade theory; comparative advantages;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:27:y:2007:i:3:p:413-430:id:573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.