IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v15y1995i2p205-230id1236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unit roots, economic fluctuations, and the “persistence” of shocks

Author

Listed:
  • João Marcus Marinho Nunes

Abstract

The relative importance of different shocks on the level of economic activityhas been a hot subject of research over the last 25 years. The traditional view, retained byKeynesians and Monetarists alike, is that shocks to aggregate demand are the impulses toeconomic fluctuations, a phenomenon independent of growth. A succession of real shocksand technological transformations gave rise to what is known as Real Business Cycle Theory.Proponents of real business cycles do not consider growth separately from fluctuations andseek to explain economic fluctuations abstracting from monetary considerations. This paperreviews the empirical evidence on the permanence of shocks. Although much can be said forthe interdependence between growth and fluctuations it also concludes, contrary to the RBCview, that economic policy is important in generating an environment conducive to growth. JEL Classification: E13; C50.

Suggested Citation

  • João Marcus Marinho Nunes, 1995. "Unit roots, economic fluctuations, and the “persistence” of shocks," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 15(2), pages 205-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:15:y:1995:i:2:p:205-230:id:1236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1236/1221
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Real business-cycle theory; unit roots; economic growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E13 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Neoclassical
    • C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:15:y:1995:i:2:p:205-230:id:1236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.