IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v18y2021i2p257-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The General Directing of Trade Cannot Be a Science: D'Argenson's 1751 Commentary Essay and the Response to It

Author

Listed:
  • René Louis de Voyer de Paulmy, Marquis d’Argenson
  • Anonymous (a Bellonian)

Abstract

René Louis de Voyer de Paulmy, Marquis d’Argenson (1694–1757) published a wonderful essay in French in 1751, expounding that knowledge problems foil any pretense of making the general directing of trade into a science. The essay was published in English, translated by Tobias Smollett, in 1754 and reprinted in 1762 in Edmund Burke’s The Annual Register. Here Smollett’s translation is reproduced with minor changes made by Benoît Malbranque based on the 1751 French publication and an original manuscript text of the essay. Malbranque also provides here a first-ever translation of a response by an unknown author who argued that, yes, the directing of trade can be a science. The exchange between d’Argenson and the anonymous author raises issues about the meaning of ‘science’ and who it is that can justly claim to speak in the name of science.

Suggested Citation

  • René Louis de Voyer de Paulmy, Marquis d’Argenson & Anonymous (a Bellonian), 2021. "The General Directing of Trade Cannot Be a Science: D'Argenson's 1751 Commentary Essay and the Response to It," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 18(2), pages 257–277-2, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:257-277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1197/DArgensonBellonianSept2021.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1254
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Laissez faire; freedom; liberty; free market; dirigisme; interventionism; Belloni;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • B0 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General
    • B1 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • B3 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:257-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.