Rational Behavior with Deficient Foresight
AbstractThe Keynesian notion that economic decision making is subject to fundamental uncertainty (as opposed to probabilistic risk) is often dismissed by contemporary economists using familiar arguments about the presumed rationality of the expectations formation process. The paper argues that this line of reasoning is invalid. The key issues involved do not concern the rationality, or otherwise, of economic agents, at least as the term "rational" seems to be understood by the majority of economists, but lie elsewhere.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Eastern Economic Association in its journal Eastern Economic Journal.
Volume (Year): 14 (1988)
Issue (Month): 3 (Jul-Sep)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: c/o Dr. Alexandre Olbrecht, The Anisfield School of Business 205, Ramapo College, 505 Ramapo Valley Road, Ramapo, New Jersey 07430, USA
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: http://www.ramapo.edu/eea/journal.html
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Shackle, G L S, 1973. "Keynes and Today's Establishment in Economic Theory: A View," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 516-19, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.