IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v32y2010i3p233-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the EPO really care about the quality of patent information?

Author

Listed:
  • Scott, Jeremy

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of quality of patent information in relation to the EPO's activities. It first points out that achievable quality is heavily dependent on the quality of the supplied original text, especially as the largely unalterable A publication is used for most retrieval purposes: the EPO has legally limited opportunities to improve quality at this stage. However, the article details the improvements that can be made to title and abstracts, and the added value supplied by classification information and by the search reports, particularly in the written opinions of the Extended European Search Report. The additional actions taken by the EPO internally to improve and maintain quality are also outlined. These include routine checks on applications, extensive training, and limited full personal responsibility until examiners are both fully trained and experienced. In addition, a more detailed quality audit on a proportion of completed applications is carried out, and also a procedure before action is completed is taken at the technical cluster level. Whilst the article comments on EPO procedure, it is the opinion of the author alone and is not an official EPO view.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott, Jeremy, 2010. "Does the EPO really care about the quality of patent information?," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 233-236, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:233-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(09)00094-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomoko Saiki, 2015. "Information quality management of patent searches from the practical viewpoint," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 58-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:233-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.