IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v32y2010i3p188-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helping others acquire, license or invest in patents with confidence - A guide for patent searchers to patent due diligence

Author

Listed:
  • Hantos, Susanne

Abstract

Investors are becoming increasingly savvy in this knowledge economy. A noticeable trend has emerged within the patenting arena in which those seeking to acquire, license or invest in patented technology are asking more focused and detailed questions in order to assess whether commitment is warranted. Being satiated with superficial or incomplete information or having lax attitudes towards patent portfolio appropriation are becoming a distant memory, as more realize that by thoroughly scrutinizing patent rights before purchase, the exposure to infringement risks or the risk of purchasing a "lemon" can be mitigated. Scrutinizing a patent portfolio to determine if it is a worthwhile investment involves conducting patent due diligence. Different types of patent searches are required at each of the four steps of due diligence and these include patent family searching, patent status searching, patent validity searching and patent infringement searching. A practical guide to each as well as their interrelationship is presented herein, as these types of searches pave the way towards identifying both the strengths and weaknesses of a patent portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Hantos, Susanne, 2010. "Helping others acquire, license or invest in patents with confidence - A guide for patent searchers to patent due diligence," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 188-197, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:188-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(09)00087-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:188-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.