IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v31y2009i3p193-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A practical approach to the reformed IPC

Author

Listed:
  • Cullen, Susan E.

Abstract

In a global collaborative effort, the Version 8 International Patent Classification Codes (IPC-8) have been applied to patent documents published prior to 2006 (backfile). This unprecedented effort employed multiple techniques, including use of earlier IPC versions, use of ECLA codes, and propagation of codes from one document to another within Inpadoc patent families. The result is that most records bear a relatively high number of codes, and family members from different authorities are coded relatively uniformly, at least at present. It is also notable that patent documents are not easily differentiated based on selective use of inventive codes because the vast majority of codes have been designated as inventive even where they cover subject matter that would be likely to figure as additional information in a substantial number of cases. Creating high precision search strategies relying on codes may be helped by requiring 2 or more codes to be present on individual documents or families. Sample searches presented are exemplary, and search strategies must be tested individually for optimizing searching in each subject matter area. Whether the reclassification effects and the propensity to make most codes "inventive" makes the IPC more akin to an indexing system is a question only time will answer.

Suggested Citation

  • Cullen, Susan E., 2009. "A practical approach to the reformed IPC," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 193-198, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:31:y:2009:i:3:p:193-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(08)00181-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:31:y:2009:i:3:p:193-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.