IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v29y2007i3p255-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Poisons and politics - Indigenous rights and IP protection

Author

Listed:
  • Armour, Kenneth J.
  • Harrison, Peter S.

Abstract

There is a heightened awareness worldwide of the importance of pharmaceutical materials derived from naturally occurring organisms, particularly plants found in the tropics. In this context, the article explores the practical and political aspects of the interface between the indigenous rights relating to the traditional knowledge of such 'natural medicines' and the interests of the countries and companies that build on that knowledge in providing widely available and improved medicines. The article refers to traditional knowledge databases and looks at two regimes of prior informed consent and benefit sharing, the contractual and disclosure approaches. Many of the key issues are highly political, with developed and developing countries having widely different approaches. The article concludes that many of these issues are likely to run for many years before being fully resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Armour, Kenneth J. & Harrison, Peter S., 2007. "Poisons and politics - Indigenous rights and IP protection," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 255-261, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:255-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(07)00043-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:255-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.