IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v29y2007i1p20-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subject analysis and search strategies - Has the searcher become the bottleneck in the search process?

Author

Listed:
  • Nijhof, Evert

Abstract

Many searches are not successful because the searcher either fails to properly identify the subject at hand - and consequently starts searching for the wrong documents - or that the searcher makes a fatal mistake while combining keywords and/or classes during the search itself. This can be avoided by taking a structured approach to searching: (1) Distinguish between analysis of the technical subject, identification of selection criteria and the selection and use of search terms. (2) When analyzing a technical subject, some guidance may be provided by recognizing that the problem is often defined as a cause and effect relationship. The solution can be seen as combination of action and subject, the subject being used to perform the action, and the action being directed at the cause. (3) While searching, a major pitfall is to try to come up with complete sets of keywords and classes for each essential feature and then to combine them for searching. The resultant queries fail to recognize that each search term is useful to a different extent. The article has particular relevance to searches in the patent field.

Suggested Citation

  • Nijhof, Evert, 2007. "Subject analysis and search strategies - Has the searcher become the bottleneck in the search process?," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 20-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:29:y:2007:i:1:p:20-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(06)00096-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ansgar Moeller & Martin G. Moehrle, 2015. "Completing keyword patent search with semantic patent search: introducing a semiautomatic iterative method for patent near search based on semantic similarities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 77-96, January.
    2. Martin G Moehrle & Irina Pfennig & Jan M Gerken, 2017. "Identifying Lead Users In A B2b Environment Based On Patent Analysis — The Case Of The Crane Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:29:y:2007:i:1:p:20-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.