IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v25y2003i2p151-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obviousness and the notional addressee team

Author

Listed:
  • Bolton, Ken

Abstract

This article reviews aspects of the determination of inventive step, stemming from a decision in the Australian Federal Court on a patent relating to connector modules for insulated telecommunications cables. Points explored include the extent and nature of the notional skilled addressee, where that addressee is a team of experts, each with their own common general knowledge, and the admissibility of expert evidence and the weight that may be given to it once admitted.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolton, Ken, 2003. "Obviousness and the notional addressee team," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 151-154, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:25:y:2003:i:2:p:151-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(03)00025-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:25:y:2003:i:2:p:151-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.