IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v176y2023ics1366554523001667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence to standard operating procedures for improving data quality: An empirical analysis in the postal service industry

Author

Listed:
  • Eskandarzadeh, Saman
  • Fahimnia, Behnam
  • Hoberg, Kai

Abstract

Complete and accurate data is an important enabler of effective supply chain decision making. Despite the increasing efforts to fully automate data collection processes using advanced sensors and scanners, human operators are still in charge of data entry tasks in most industries. Unfortunately, operators do not often comply with the standard operating procedures (SOPs) and do not always exhibit the consistency and commitment required to collect high-quality data. In fact, data collection is often perceived as a non-value-adding activity that increases workloads and lowers productivity. We aim to empirically study the extent to which compliance with SOPs for data collection is affected by some of the key factors. Using a large dataset obtained from a leading postal service provider in Australia, we find that an operator’s workload, fatigue, and related work experience directly impact the compliance levels. We also find that a company’s compliance reinforcement intervention to improve compliance behavior can moderate these impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Eskandarzadeh, Saman & Fahimnia, Behnam & Hoberg, Kai, 2023. "Adherence to standard operating procedures for improving data quality: An empirical analysis in the postal service industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:176:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523001667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554523001667
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:176:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523001667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.