IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v83y2013icp64-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource transfers and evolution: Helpful offspring and sex allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Stubblefield, J. William
  • Orzack, Steven Hecht

Abstract

In some vertebrates, offspring help their parents produce additional offspring. Often individuals of one sex are more likely to become “helpers at the nest†. We analyze how such sex-biased offspring helping can influence sex-ratio evolution. It is essential to account for age-structure because the sex ratios of early broods influence how much help is available for later broods; previous authors have not correctly accounted for this fact. When each female produces the same sex ratio in all broods (as assumed in all previous analyses of sex-biased helping), the optimal investment strategy is biased towards the more-helpful sex. When a female has facultative control over the sex ratio in each brood and each helper of a given sex increases the resource available for offspring production by a fixed amount, the optimal strategy is to produce only the more-helpful sex in early broods and only the less-helpful sex in later broods. When there are nonlinear returns from helping, i.e., each helper increases the amount of resource available for reproduction by an amount dependent upon the number of helpers, the optimal strategy is to maximize resource accrual from helping in early broods (which may involve the production of both sexes) and then switch to the exclusive production of the less-helpful sex in later broods. The population sex ratio is biased towards the more-helpful sex regardless of whether the sex ratio is fixed or age-dependent. When fitness returns from helping exhibit environmental patchiness, females are selected to produce only males on some patches and only females on others, and the population sex ratio may be biased in either direction. We discuss our results in light of empirical information on offspring helping, and we show via meta-analysis that there is no support for the claim of Griffin et al. [Griffin, A.S., Sheldon, B.C., West, S.A., 2005. Cooperative breeders adjust offspring sex ratios to produce helpful helpers. Amer. Nat. 166, 628–632] that parents produce more of the helpful sex when that sex is rare or absent.

Suggested Citation

  • Stubblefield, J. William & Orzack, Steven Hecht, 2013. "Resource transfers and evolution: Helpful offspring and sex allocation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 64-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:83:y:2013:i:c:p:64-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580912000937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2012.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John G. Ewen & Ross H. Crozier & Phillip Cassey & Tamsin Ward-Smith & Jodie N. Painter & Raleigh J. Robertson & David A. Jones & Michael F. Clarke, 2003. "Facultative control of offspring sex in the cooperatively breeding bell miner, Manorina melanophrys," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 157-164, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haywood, Andrew & Stone, Christine, 2011. "Mapping eucalypt forest susceptible to dieback associated with bell miners (Manorina melanophys) using laser scanning, SPOT 5 and ancillary topographical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1174-1184.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:83:y:2013:i:c:p:64-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.