IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v129y2019icp103-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural bistability and connectedness in a subdivided population

Author

Listed:
  • Aoki, Kenichi

Abstract

We propose a stochastic model of cultural evolution in a hunter–gatherer population that is subdivided into demes (subpopulations) of variable size and distributed over a finite or infinite number of sites. We assume a skill acquirable by either social or individual learning, such as the know how for positive niche construction, which raises the carrying capacity of a site. We further assume a positive feedback between the number of individuals in a deme with the skill and the size of that deme, which entails that, for most of the time, a deme will either be small and include few skilled individuals or large and include many skilled individuals. Our principal goal is to examine the effect of the migration rate among sites, a measure of their connectedness, on the frequency and duration of shifts to the large-deme/many-skilled-individuals condition that simultaneously involve many demes. We find that the frequency of these concerted shifts is maximized at an intermediate migration rate, whereas their mean duration is monotone increasing in the migration rate. Finally, we use these theoretical predictions to interpret the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort industries, which are believed to have had spatially-synchronous and widespread distributions of relatively short duration in southern Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Aoki, Kenichi, 2019. "Cultural bistability and connectedness in a subdivided population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 103-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:103-117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580918301576
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2019.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:103-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.