IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v28y2004i2p213-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3G licensing in Hong Kong: The debate

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Xu

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of a policy debate that has led to a unique 3G licensing scheme in Hong Kong. Key issues to be addressed include the choice of technical standards, allocation of radio spectrum, licensing options and open network requirement. With reference to the case of Hong Kong, the author argues explicitly that the winner's curse can be prevented by means of a carefully designed auction mechanism, the alleviation of licence scarcity and the firm pro-entry policy objective of the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Xu, 2004. "3G licensing in Hong Kong: The debate," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 213-226, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:213-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596103001113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Fioriti & Allan Hernandez-Chanto, 2022. "Leveling the Playing Field for Risk-Averse Agents in Security-Bid Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5441-5463, July.
    2. Xue, Minggao & Su, Lili, 2011. "Licensing to a durable-good duopoly in patent litigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 1186-1194, May.
    3. Hemant K. Sabat, 2008. "Spectrum acquisition strategies adopted by wireless carriers in the USA," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 77-102, March.
    4. Kwon, Youngsun & Kim, Buhm-Kyu, 2012. "Royalties vs. upfront lump-sum fees in data communication environments," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 127-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:213-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.