IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x23002579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patent priority examination under mission orientation: can speed and quality coexist?

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Haodong
  • Zhang, Yumei
  • Liu, Li

Abstract

Under the backdrop of mission-oriented innovation, the rapid implementation of innovative achievements depends not only on research and development activities, but also on the patent examination process. Striking a balance between improving examination speed and ensuring the quality of granted patents poses a challenge. This paper delineates two pivotal mission categories—grand challenge (climate change) and major emergency (COVID-19), utilizing the conceptual framework of “urgency” that has been constructed. We primarily focus on the impact of the patent priority examination institution on examination period and patent quality under the two missions. Based on data from over 300,000 patents belonging to the fields of vehicle manufacturing and medicine in China, difference-in-differences and survival analysis are used to conduct empirical tests. The research results indicate that under certain missions, both climate change and COVID-19, the “green channel” could shorten the examination period without compromising the quality of authorized patents. Through further analysis, we also find that, patent examination acceleration is mainly manifested by alleviating the authorization lag (rather than publication lag). Additionally, the prioritization institution has changed the impact of applicant characteristics (organizational and country attributes) on the patent examination period.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Haodong & Zhang, Yumei & Liu, Li, 2024. "Patent priority examination under mission orientation: can speed and quality coexist?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002579
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23002579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.