IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x2300235x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated decision-making: Hoteliers’ perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Ivanov, Stanislav
  • Webster, Craig

Abstract

The paper investigates the attitudes of hoteliers towards the use of artificial intelligence in the decision-making process in various departments within hotels. It evaluates the preferences towards four decision-making approaches (‘human only’, ‘human-in-the-loop’, ‘human-on-the-loop’ and ‘human-out-of-the-loop’) applied to 23 decisions in 8 hotel departments. The sample includes 130 respondents from the Bulgarian hotel industry. Two clusters of managers are identified based on their attitudes towards AI technologies, with the majority having a positive view of the technology and a minority being sceptical of such technology for hotel decision-making. Hoteliers show a preference to delegate decisions to AI for decisions that do not require much emotional intelligence or interactions with customers/employees. The personal characteristics of the managers (biological sex, age, education, work experience and job position) and the characteristics of the properties they manage (size, category and location) play no role in shaping managers' preferences towards the AI decision-making approach. The findings also indicate that general attitudes towards AI are the best indicator of whether an individual prefers the use of AI for a particular type of decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivanov, Stanislav & Webster, Craig, 2024. "Automated decision-making: Hoteliers’ perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x2300235x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2300235X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x2300235x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.