IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v43y2015icp86-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology and gender: A case study on “iron girls” in China (1950s–1970s)

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Meifang
  • Liu, Bing

Abstract

“Iron girls” is a unique phrase which has become widely popularized from the 1950s through the 1970s in China. It was a metaphor, applied especially to represent a group of women who were often tall, sturdy and able to do heavy physical work at the site of farmland, factories or engineering projects, and were recognized as the typical outstanding women at the time. By combining the relevant news reports of the period and articles of reminiscences of iron girls themselves, we examined the iron girls' typical occupations and their changes over time, and analyzed the complex relationship between technology and gender behind this phenomenon. It concludes that iron girls were brought into the whole narrative system of China's modernization construction, and their personal liberation was obscured under a powerful metaphor of the mechanization; Technology was involved in the shaping of the new gender stereotypes, but the emergence and popularity of iron girls during this time had no substantial impacts on the development of technology and did not alter the gender stratification in the fields of technology; iron girls got important status at the price of the physical and mental damage; they actually serviced as a tool in the publicity of a kind of ideology of gender equality that attributes to embody the state's will-power in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Meifang & Liu, Bing, 2015. "Technology and gender: A case study on “iron girls” in China (1950s–1970s)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 86-94.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:43:y:2015:i:c:p:86-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15000408
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:43:y:2015:i:c:p:86-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.