IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v201y2024ics0040162524000726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological impact assessment of green technological innovation under different thresholds of human capital in G20 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alfalih, Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen
  • Hadj, Tarek Bel

Abstract

Under the globalized situation of environmental damage, increasing scarcity of resources, and uncertainty about their costs, challenges have been imposed for the saving of energy and inputs used, the transition to green energy and pollution reduction. Green innovation can be assimilated as a radical solution to meet these challenges and make the production process greener. The present study aims at examining the ecological effects of green innovation and the human capital by using the double-threshold model and the quantile regression method to the case of G20 over the period 1998–2017. Therefore, the objective of the study is to scrutinize the impact of environmental-related technology and the human facet on the ecological footprint (ECF), and to examine whether these effects are conditioned by the different thresholds of human capital index (HCI). The existing literature has not sufficiently analyzed these effects in the presence of different levels of environmental degradation and human capital, especially when human capacities and green technological innovation are integrated in a single model as mitigators of ECF. The results of the panel quantile regression revealed that the green technological innovation is an important mitigator of ECF whatever the level of environmental degradation of G20 economies. In addition, panel threshold technique disclosed that the positive repercussions of green innovation and human capital on environmental quality are only recorded above a threshold level of the HCI. Our findings revealed beside that the impact of lagged green innovation on the ECF are moderated by human capital, but only above a given threshold of human capital, which reflects that the latter plays an awareness-raising and non-functional role to reduce ECF when it is below the threshold level. The insights provided by this study can serve policy makers on actions that need to be directed with respect to green innovation and human capital development for global environmental policy tracers.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfalih, Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen & Hadj, Tarek Bel, 2024. "Ecological impact assessment of green technological innovation under different thresholds of human capital in G20 countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:201:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524000726
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524000726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ecological footprint; Green innovation; Human capital; G20 countries; Panel quantile regression; Panel threshold regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:201:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524000726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.