IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v201y2024ics0040162524000076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scope and limits of AI fundraisers: Moderated serial multiple mediation model between artificial emotions and willingness to donate via humanness and empathy

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Gain
  • Chung, Jiyun
  • Lee, Seyoung

Abstract

Charitable organizations are experiencing a global labor shortage. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have been employed to help combat the shortage, however, the scope and limits of AI fundraisers are still unclear, calling for further investigation. To improve our understanding of AI fundraisers, this study recruited 654 adults from an online crowdsourcing platform and developed six chatbot agents (emotional vs. factual × no image vs. machinelike image vs. human image). First, we employed an independent samples t-test to examine the effect of chatbots' conversational style on willingness to donate to Ukraine war victims. This study also tested the mediating roles (independent and serial) of perceived humanness and empathy toward victims in the relationship between chatbots' emotional expression and willingness to donate by conducting a serial multiple mediation analysis. Finally, this study tested the moderating role of visual cues (no image vs. machinelike image vs. human image) by conducting a moderated serial multiple mediation analysis. The results revealed that emotional chatbots yield a higher willingness to donate, and perceived humanness and empathy toward victims mediate this relationship independently and serially. However, the results suggest that visual cues did not significantly moderate the relationship between chatbot agents' emotional expression on willingness to donate.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Gain & Chung, Jiyun & Lee, Seyoung, 2024. "Scope and limits of AI fundraisers: Moderated serial multiple mediation model between artificial emotions and willingness to donate via humanness and empathy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:201:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524000076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524000076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:201:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524000076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.