IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v200y2024ics0040162523008259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence and the skill premium: A numerical analysis of theoretical models

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Can
  • Luo, Jiayu
  • Zhu, Chun
  • Zhang, Shangfeng

Abstract

As a new engine in guiding China's high-quality economic development, it is important to study whether the development of artificial intelligence (AI) will increase the skill premium and affect labor income inequality. Based on Acemoglu and Restrepo's (2018a) task-based model, this study constructs a multi-sector dynamic general equilibrium (DGE) model to analyze the impact and mechanism of AI on the skill premium and performs a numerical simulation using China's industrial panel data from 2010 to 2019. The results show that AI widens the skill premium by substituting low-skilled labor with industrial robots and performing high-skilled labor tasks. The mechanism analysis reveals that AI also affects the skill premium by influencing factor flow and structural transformation. Based on these findings, this study provides policy suggestions for governments to mitigate the impact of AI on the labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Can & Luo, Jiayu & Zhu, Chun & Zhang, Shangfeng, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the skill premium: A numerical analysis of theoretical models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523008259
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.