IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v200y2024ics0040162523007953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media opinion leaders and information diffusion of crowdfunding projects: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Liang
  • Sun, Zhe
  • Chen, Si
  • Gugnani, Ritika
  • Sahore, Nidhi

Abstract

Opinion leaders play essential roles in online social media and are the key to analyzing the process of information diffusion. While the crowdfunding market has exhibited rapid growth, empirical studies about social media opinion leaders in the crowdfunding context remain nascent. Specifically, efforts to identify opinion leaders in social media and to understand the mechanisms by which such opinion leaders influence others in the crowdfunding context are limited. Based on the information diffusion theory, this study aims to address these research gaps by applying a multiple-case research design combined with dynamic network analysis (DNA). By analyzing user-generated content related to selected case projects from Weibo, the most popular micro-blogging site in China, the study identifies five types of social media opinion leaders. In addition, it investigates the various roles of opinion leaders in the information diffusion process on social media. Theoretically, this study broadens the boundaries of the “two-step flow” model and the diffusion of innovations theory by applying them to the crowdfunding context. The findings of this study provide valuable insights on crowdfunding project promotion for both crowdfunding platform operators and project initiators.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Liang & Sun, Zhe & Chen, Si & Gugnani, Ritika & Sahore, Nidhi, 2024. "Social media opinion leaders and information diffusion of crowdfunding projects: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007953
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523007953
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.