Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

On optimal confidence sets for parameters in discrete distributions

Contents:

Author Info

  • Habiger, Joshua D.
  • McCann, Melinda H.
  • Tebbs, Joshua M.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    In discrete distributions, the coverage probability and the expected length of an interval estimator often depend on the unknown parameter of interest. Some authors have suggested that “good” interval estimators should have mean coverage probability near the nominal level and small mean expected length, where the mean is taken over all possible values of the parameter. This paper uses these criteria to precisely define an optimal interval estimator and finds it in the single-parameter discrete distribution setting.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715212003641
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.

    Volume (Year): 83 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 297-303

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:1:p:297-303

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description

    Order Information:
    Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
    Web: https://shop.elsevier.com/order?id=505573&ref=505573_01_ooc_1&version=01

    Related research

    Keywords: Confidence interval; Coverage probability; Expected length;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Schafer, Chad M. & Stark, Philip B., 2009. "Constructing Confidence Regions of Optimal Expected Size," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1080-1089.
    2. Agresti, Alan & Gottard, Anna, 2007. "Nonconservative exact small-sample inference for discrete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6447-6458, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:1:p:297-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.