Testing the no-treatment effect based on a possibly misspecified accelerated failure time model
AbstractThe accelerated failure time model is a useful alternative to the Cox proportional hazard model. We investigate whether or not a misspecified accelerated failure time model provides a valid test of the no-treatment effect in randomized clinical trials. We show that the minimum dispersion statistic based on rank regression by Wei et al. (1990) must be modified in order to conduct valid tests under misspecification, whereas the resampling-based methods by Jin et al. (2003) are valid without any modification. Numerical studies are conducted to examine the small sample behavior of the modified minimum dispersion statistic and the resampling-based method. Finally, an illustration is given with a dataset from a clinical trial.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.
Volume (Year): 82 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Zhezhen Jin, 2003. "Rank-based inference for the accelerated failure time model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 341-353, June.
- A. G. DiRienzo & S. W. Lagakos, 2001. "Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 745-757.
- Hattori, Satoshi, 2006. "Some properties of misspecified additive hazards models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(15), pages 1641-1646, September.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.