IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v79y2009i6p780-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Fisher's Z transformation of correlation random fields

Author

Listed:
  • Carbonell, F.
  • Worsley, K.J.
  • Trujillo-Barreto, N.J.

Abstract

One of the most interesting problems studied in Random Field Theory (RFT) is to approximate the distribution of the maximum of a random field. This problem usually appears in a general hypothesis testing framework, where the statistics of interest are the maximum of a random field of a known distribution. In this paper, we use the RFT approach to compare two independent correlation random fields,R1 and R2. Our statistics of interest are the maximum of a random field G, resulting from the difference between the Fisher's Z transformation of R1 and R2, respectively. The Fisher's Z transformation guarantees a Gaussian distribution at each point of G but, unfortunately, G is not transformed into a Gaussian random field. Hence, standard results of RFT for Gaussian random fields are not longer available for G. We show here that the distribution of the maximum of G can still be approximated by the distribution of the maximum of a Gaussian random field, provided there is some correction by its spatial smoothness. Indeed, we present a general setting to obtain this correction. This is done by allowing different smoothness parameters for the components of G. Finally, the performance of our method is illustrated by means of both numerical simulations and real Electroencephalography data, recorded during a face recognition experimental paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Carbonell, F. & Worsley, K.J. & Trujillo-Barreto, N.J., 2009. "On the Fisher's Z transformation of correlation random fields," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 780-788, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:6:p:780-788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(08)00515-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:6:p:780-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.