IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v41y1999i4p347-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on Rüger's test for discrete data

Author

Listed:
  • Krummenauer, Frank

Abstract

Based on Tarone's modified Bonferroni procedure for discrete test statistics (Tarone (1990), Biometrics 46, 515-522) modified Rüger procedures are presented to draw inferences on either the global and the individual null hypotheses. Advantages and disadvantages of these tests are outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Krummenauer, Frank, 1999. "A note on Rüger's test for discrete data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 347-351, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:41:y:1999:i:4:p:347-351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(98)00149-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Hommel, 1986. "Multiple test procedures for arbitrary dependence structures," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 321-336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krummenauer, Frank, 1999. "Conservativeness of global tests for bivariate binomial and Poisson data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 407-412, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krummenauer, Frank, 1999. "Conservativeness of global tests for bivariate binomial and Poisson data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 407-412, February.
    2. Joseph P. Romano & Michael Wolf, 2005. "Exact and Approximate Stepdown Methods for Multiple Hypothesis Testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 94-108, March.
    3. Gudrun Bernhard & Markus Klein & Gerhard Hommel, 2004. "Global and multiple test procedures using ordered p-values—a review," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:41:y:1999:i:4:p:347-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.