IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v13y1992i5p351-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for automatic bandwidth choice in variations on kernel density estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, M. C.

Abstract

Recently, much progress has been made on understanding the bandwidth selection problem in kernel density estimation. Here, analogous questions are considered for extensions to the basic problem, namely, for estimating derivatives, using 'better' kernel estimators, and for the multivariate case. In basic kernel density estimation, recent advances have resulted in considerable improvements being made over 'moderate' methods such as least squares cross-validation. Here, it is argued that, in the first two extension cases, the performance of moderate methods deteriorates even more, so that the necessity for 'improved' methods -- and indeed their potential in theory if not necessarily in practice -- is greatly increased. Rather extraordinary things happen, however, when higher dimensions are considered. This paper is essentially that of Jones (1991).

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, M. C., 1992. "Potential for automatic bandwidth choice in variations on kernel density estimation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 351-356, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:13:y:1992:i:5:p:351-356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(92)90107-G
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:13:y:1992:i:5:p:351-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.