IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v13y1992i4p321-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scalable relative effectiveness models

Author

Listed:
  • Murdoch, Duncan J.

Abstract

Murdoch and Krewski (1988) introduced the concept of the relative effectiveness of dosing in models of carcinogenesis with time-dependent exposure. Under certain models, such as the Armitage--Doll multistage model with a single stage dose-dependent, the hazard H(t) from any pattern of dosing d(·) may be calculated under a constant dosing model using an equivalent constant dose d*(t) which is simply an average of the true dose rate weighted proportionally to the relative effectiveness at each time from 0 to t. The multistage model has the property of scalable relative effectiveness: the relative effectiveness function is the same (except for a rescaling of the time axis) for any time t. In this paper we consider general models with scalable relative effectiveness and arbitrary constant dose hazard functions. Not all such models are valid, and we derive a characterization of those that are: the constant dosing hazard may be proportional to any increasing function k(t) with k(0) = 0, and the relative effectiveness must increase slower than a fixed power of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Murdoch, Duncan J., 1992. "Scalable relative effectiveness models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 321-324, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:13:y:1992:i:4:p:321-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(92)90041-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duncan J. Murdoch & Daniel Krewski & John Wargo, 1992. "Cancer Risk Assessment with Intermittent Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 569-577, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:13:y:1992:i:4:p:321-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.