IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v125y2015i3p886-917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A predator–prey SIR type dynamics on large complete graphs with three phase transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Kortchemski, Igor

Abstract

We study a variation of the SIR (Susceptible/Infected/Recovered) dynamics on the complete graph, in which infected individuals may only spread to neighboring susceptible individuals at fixed rate λ>0 while recovered individuals may only spread to neighboring infected individuals at fixed rate 1. This is also a variant of the so-called chase–escape process introduced by Kordzakhia and then Bordenave. Our work is the first study of this dynamics on complete graphs. Starting with one infected and one recovered individuals on the complete graph with N+2 vertices, and stopping the process when one type of individuals disappears, we study the asymptotic behavior of the probability that the infection spreads to the whole graph as N→∞ and show that for λ∈(0,1) (resp. for λ>1), the infection dies out (resp. does not die out) with probability tending to one as N→∞, and that the probability that the infection dies out tends to 1/2 for λ=1. We also establish limit theorems concerning the final state of the system in all regimes and show that two additional phase transitions occur in the subcritical phase λ∈(0,1): at λ=1/2 the behavior of the expected number of remaining infected individuals changes, while at λ=(5−1)/2 the behavior of the expected number of remaining recovered individuals changes. We also study the outbreak sizes of the infection, and show that the outbreak sizes are small (or self-limiting) if λ∈(0,1/2], exhibit a power-law behavior for 1/2<λ<1, and are pandemic for λ⩾1. Our method relies on different couplings: we first couple the dynamics with two independent Yule processes by using an Athreya–Karlin embedding, and then we couple the Yule processes with Poisson processes thanks to Kendall’s representation of Yule processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kortchemski, Igor, 2015. "A predator–prey SIR type dynamics on large complete graphs with three phase transitions," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 886-917.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:125:y:2015:i:3:p:886-917
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2014.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414914002452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2014.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kordzakhia, George & Lalley, Steven P., 2005. "A two-species competition model on," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(5), pages 781-796, May.
    2. Aldous, David & Krebs, William B., 1990. "The 'birth-and-assassination' process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 427-430, October.
    3. Janson, Svante, 2004. "Functional limit theorems for multitype branching processes and generalized Pólya urns," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 177-245, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Kortchemski, 2016. "Predator–Prey Dynamics on Infinite Trees: A Branching Random Walk Approach," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1027-1046, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soumaya Idriss & Hosam Mahmoud, 2023. "Exact Covariances and Refined Asymptotics in Dichromatic Tenable Balanced Pólya Urn Schemes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Crimaldi, Irene & Dai Pra, Paolo & Louis, Pierre-Yves & Minelli, Ida G., 2019. "Synchronization and functional central limit theorems for interacting reinforced random walks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 70-101.
    3. Berti, Patrizia & Crimaldi, Irene & Pratelli, Luca & Rigo, Pietro, 2010. "Central limit theorems for multicolor urns with dominated colors," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 120(8), pages 1473-1491, August.
    4. Michael D Nicholson & Tibor Antal, 2019. "Competing evolutionary paths in growing populations with applications to multidrug resistance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    5. José Moler & Fernando Plo & Henar Urmeneta, 2013. "A generalized Pólya urn and limit laws for the number of outputs in a family of random circuits," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 46-61, March.
    6. Mailler, Cécile & Marckert, Jean-François, 2022. "Parameterised branching processes: A functional version of Kesten & Stigum theorem," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 339-377.
    7. Gopal K. Basak & Amites Dasgupta, 2006. "Central and Functional Central Limit Theorems for a Class of Urn Models," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 741-756, December.
    8. Yuan, Ao & Chai, Gen Xiang, 2008. "Optimal adaptive generalized Polya urn design for multi-arm clinical trials," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Dimitris Cheliotis & Dimitra Kouloumpou, 2022. "Functional Limit Theorems for the Pólya Urn," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 2038-2051, September.
    10. Kaj, Ingemar & Tahir, Daniah, 2019. "Stochastic equations and limit results for some two-type branching models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 35-46.
    11. Kaur, Gursharn & Choi, Kwok Pui & Wu, Taoyang, 2023. "Distributions of cherries and pitchforks for the Ford model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 27-38.
    12. Patrizia Berti & Irene Crimaldi & Luca Pratelli & Pietro Rigo, 2009. "Central Limit Theorems For Multicolor Urns With Dominated Colors," Quaderni di Dipartimento 106, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    13. Berbeglia, Franco & Berbeglia, Gerardo & Van Hentenryck, Pascal, 2021. "Market segmentation in online platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1025-1041.
    14. Chen Chen & Hosam Mahmoud, 2018. "The continuous-time triangular Pólya process," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(2), pages 303-321, April.
    15. Mitsokapas, Evangelos & Harris, Rosemary J., 2022. "Decision-making with distorted memory: Escaping the trap of past experience," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    16. Yuan Ao & Tan Ming T. & Li Qizhai & Xiong Ming, 2016. "Adaptive Design for Staggered-Start Clinical Trial," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Igor Kortchemski, 2016. "Predator–Prey Dynamics on Infinite Trees: A Branching Random Walk Approach," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1027-1046, September.
    18. Kolesko, Konrad & Sava-Huss, Ecaterina, 2023. "Limit theorems for discrete multitype branching processes counted with a characteristic," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 49-75.
    19. Brigitte Chauvin & Cécile Mailler & Nicolas Pouyanne, 2015. "Smoothing Equations for Large Pólya Urns," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 923-957, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:125:y:2015:i:3:p:886-917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.