IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v14yi1-2p77-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heidegger and organization: Notes towards a new research programme

Author

Listed:
  • Sköldberg, Kaj

Abstract

The philosophy of Heidegger is matched in its influence on 20th century thinking perhaps only by that of Wittgenstein: yet it has been relatively sparsely utilized in the social sciences generally and more particularly in organization/management studies. The meaning of Being constitutes Heidegger's central problematic, to which all other aspects are related. Prominent among these is his poetic "fourfold": meaningful, "ecstatic" time instead of abstract, disenchanted time: the structure of care and belonging; the sacredness -- concealed or not -- of symbols; and the analytic of finiitude and death. There is also a second and more prosaic fourfold of Being, the elements of which are change, reason, values, and empirical knowledge -- all in their de-alienated, ontological interpretation, radically different from the conventional notions. On a basis of this double fourfold of Being, a new programme for organization and management research is tentatively proposed in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Sköldberg, Kaj, 0. "Heidegger and organization: Notes towards a new research programme," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 77-102, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:14:y::i:1-2:p:77-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522197000316
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:14:y::i:1-2:p:77-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.