IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v69y2024ics027553192400059x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decomposition of social networks and household purchase of insurance as knowledge products

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Xiaojun
  • Du, Baorui

Abstract

This paper proposes a nested model of household social networks and re-examines how social networks affect household insurance consumption by decomposing inner and outer networks in tandem. Using the 2013 and 2015 waves of China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), we find that the inner networks substitute and the outer networks supplement insurance consumption. Our results help reconcile the inconsistency of the evidence on how social networks affect household insurance demand in the literature. Both the inner and outer networks contribute to the urban–rural gap of household insurance ownership. Mechanism analysis indicates that the inner networks affect household insurance purchase through risk-sharing and the outer networks through information dissemination and learning. Outer networks are of value to screen insurance companies by word-of-mouth. Surprisingly, insurance renewal analysis suggests that inner kinship networks have no persistent impeding effects, while the mutable outer networks persistently complement household insurance consumption. Households with male heads acquire stronger risk-sharing of inner networks than female heads.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Xiaojun & Du, Baorui, 2024. "Decomposition of social networks and household purchase of insurance as knowledge products," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:69:y:2024:i:c:s027553192400059x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027553192400059X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:69:y:2024:i:c:s027553192400059x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.