IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v67y2024ipbs0275531923002350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance feedback and corporate maturity mismatch: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jingxin
  • Ye, Yong
  • Li, Jingxuan

Abstract

Based on the behavioral theory of the firm, we argue that different kinds of performance feedback change firms' financing demands and sources, thus affecting the corporate maturity mismatch between investment and financing. Using data on Chinese A-share listed firms, our findings suggest that positive performance feedback reduces maturity mismatch, and conversely, negative performance feedback exacerbates maturity mismatch. Further, research shows that financing constraints are the primary avenue through which performance feedback affects maturity mismatches. We also explore the heterogeneity of this influence relationship across the different characteristics of firms’ property rights, factor intensity, and performance feedback persistence. Our study helps explain the formation of a corporate maturity mismatch from the perspective of a firm's behavior. These findings have significant implications for achieving stable capital market operations and high-quality corporate development in China and other emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jingxin & Ye, Yong & Li, Jingxuan, 2024. "Performance feedback and corporate maturity mismatch: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:67:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531923002350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531923002350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:67:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531923002350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.