IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v91y2024icp83-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive equity incentive plans: Effective golden handcuffs?

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Baohua
  • Zhang, Nihui
  • Chan, Kam C.
  • Chen, Yining
  • Qiu, Xuemei

Abstract

We examine the impact of executive equity incentive plans (EEIPs) on the retention of targeted (those subject to EEIPs) and non-targeted (those not subject to EEIPs) executives using a sample of Chinese firms. Our findings suggest that EEIPs help retain executives if we do not distinguish targeted and non-targeted executives. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that, on average, targeted (non-targeted) executives in EEIP firms have an approximately 16% lower (43% higher) chance of leaving their current jobs than the average turnover rate of executives in a non-EEIP firm. Additional analysis suggests that 1) the golden-handcuff effect on targeted executives occurs primarily in the first two years of EEIPs, while the push-away effect on non-targeted executives lasts for four years, and 2) non-targeted executives are more likely to leave when they have low compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Baohua & Zhang, Nihui & Chan, Kam C. & Chen, Yining & Qiu, Xuemei, 2024. "Executive equity incentive plans: Effective golden handcuffs?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 83-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:91:y:2024:i:c:p:83-97
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024000030
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:91:y:2024:i:c:p:83-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.