IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v89y2024ipbp363-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can social trust promote the professional division of labor in firms? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Linrong
  • Zeng, Huixiang

Abstract

The informal institution of social trust has a crucial impact on economic activities. Based on social learning theory and social network theory, this study investigates the impact of social trust on the participation of firms in the professional division of labor. We find that firms in areas with a high level of social trust are more inclined to participate in the professional division of labor. Our results are robust to various measures of social trust and the professional division of labor, and are also robust after using the two-stage least-squares (2SLS) method to control for potential endogeneity. The mechanism analysis demonstrates that social trust can promote firms to participate in the professional division of labor by reducing search and contract costs. Further analyses show that social trust can improve total factor productivity (TFP) by promoting firms to participate in the professional division of labor, and that if the formal legal system cannot effectively protect the rights and interests of firms, social trust can play a substituting role.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Linrong & Zeng, Huixiang, 2024. "Can social trust promote the professional division of labor in firms? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 363-377.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pb:p:363-377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023003970
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pb:p:363-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.