IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v89y2024ipap605-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligent portfolio construction via news sentiment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hung, Ming-Chin
  • Hsia, Ping-Hung
  • Kuang, Xian-Ji
  • Lin, Shih-Kuei

Abstract

In this study, we apply deep learning and natural language processing methods to construct the view distribution in the Black–Litterman model. We implement this approach for portfolio allocation and perform statistical analysis to assess portfolio performance. The empirical analysis yields two main results. For the three deep learning models, we use mean square error to compare the model prediction results. The gated recurrent unit (GRU) model outperforms the other two models in the price prediction of seven stock assets. Moreover, it is more effective in capturing future trends and stock prices. The long short-term memory (LSTM) model outperforms the recurrent neural network (RNN) model. Moreover, in the comparison of the portfolio models, the Black–Litterman model, constructed by using Google’s Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to measure news sentiment and by using the GRU model to predict stock prices, yields the highest annualized return rate of 46.6%. In addition, it has the highest Sharpe and Sortino ratios of 13.0% and 17.9%, respectively, which means that under a certain degree of risk, the Black–Litterman model still outperforms other constructed portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung, Ming-Chin & Hsia, Ping-Hung & Kuang, Xian-Ji & Lin, Shih-Kuei, 2024. "Intelligent portfolio construction via news sentiment analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 605-617.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:605-617
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023003131
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:605-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.