IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v89y2024ipap1286-1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semantics matter: An empirical study on economic policy uncertainty index

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Chung-Chi
  • Huang, Yu-Lieh
  • Yang, Fang

Abstract

When dealing with textual data, previous studies mainly used a keyword-based matching method to construct indices. The economic policy uncertainty (EPU) index proposed by Baker et al. (2016) is an example. In this paper, we argue that due to its neglect of semantics, such keyword matching generates excessive noise, which affects the index quality and further leads to incorrect inferences. We investigated several neural network models and selected the best-performing classifier to remove the noise caused by keyword matching. Our empirical results revealed that the de-noised EPU index is useful in predicting economic variables and generating superior out-of-sample forecasts. Furthermore, the effects of policy uncertainty shocks on core macro variables of interest are consistent with the predictions of macroeconomic theory. Because the proposed approach is a general framework, in the future all keyword matching-based indexes can be improved under the same approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Chung-Chi & Huang, Yu-Lieh & Yang, Fang, 2024. "Semantics matter: An empirical study on economic policy uncertainty index," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1286-1302.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:1286-1302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023003350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:1286-1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.