IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v53y2024i2s0048733323002007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid governance of platform entrepreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • Koo, Wesley W.

Abstract

Platform organizations have assumed an important role in the governance of millions of entrepreneurs. Powerful platforms play an internal gatekeeping role in governing the platform-dependent entrepreneurs, but the success of platform governance also depends on how those entrepreneurs respond to external governance regimes (e.g., governments and public agencies). We conducted a vignette experiment involving 3000 e-commerce sellers to evaluate the effectiveness of hybrid governance (platform rules reminding entrepreneurs of the law and public enforcement) versus platform-led governance (platform rules without such reminders). The experiment varies on the governance structure (hybrid versus platform-led) and the level of ambiguity in a platform rule. It finds that, relative to platform-led governance, hybrid governance reduced entrepreneurs' misconduct intentions by 26 %. The effect is especially strong when rules are more ambiguous. Mechanism tests show that a fear of government intervention likely led entrepreneurs to comply with hybrid governance out of expedience as ambiguity increases. Meanwhile, some entrepreneurs still exhibited greater misconduct intentions because they may have perceived the platform to be opportunistic and willing to condone misconduct. Overall, this study demonstrates the nested nature of platform governance and the multiplex influences of different governance regimes on entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Koo, Wesley W., 2024. "Hybrid governance of platform entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:2:s0048733323002007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002007
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:2:s0048733323002007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.