IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v52y2023i8s0048733323001075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are patent offices substitutes?

Author

Listed:
  • Petit, Elise
  • van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno
  • Gimeno-Fabra, Lluis

Abstract

This paper evaluates whether and to what extent search and examination processes at patent offices are substitutes. Based on an original dataset comprising 4.884 patents filed simultaneously in Japan, the USA and Europe, the empirical analysis confirms that the degree of substitution is significant within the PCT framework. When patent offices have access to the search for prior art of other offices, they search into less technology classes, send fewer communications, or rely more on international citations. They also cite 12 % to 32 % less prior art. Further substitution could still be achieved, as 8 % to 27 % of remaining backward citations are duplicates -voluntarily or not - of prior work. Taken together, work reductions and overlaps witness a degree of substitution of about 37 % between the three patent offices.

Suggested Citation

  • Petit, Elise & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno & Gimeno-Fabra, Lluis, 2023. "Are patent offices substitutes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:8:s0048733323001075
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:8:s0048733323001075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.